The Comfort of Identity
- Nish Sehgal

- 14 hours ago
- 2 min read

A name is given early. A history follows. Preferences form, positions solidify, stories accumulate. Over time, these fragments gather into something that feels stable. A center emerges, a sense of being someone in particular, distinct and continuous.
This center feels natural. Necessary. Obvious.
But is it?
Identity is rarely examined because it provides orientation. It answers questions quickly: Who am I? What do I stand for? Where do I belong? It reduces complexity. It simplifies interaction. It offers psychological shelter.
Without identity, there is openness.
With identity, there is boundary.
Why does boundary feel safer than openness?
Identity does not merely describe, it defends. It selects experiences that confirm itself and resists those that threaten coherence. Contradictions create discomfort because they loosen the structure. Adjustments are made. Explanations are constructed. Inconsistencies are rationalized. All to preserve continuity.
But continuity of what?
The sense of “me” is not fixed, it is maintained. Memory reinforces it. Repetition strengthens it. Language stabilizes it. Yet when closely observed, identity behaves less like a solid core and more like a narrative under constant revision.
Remove the story temporarily, and what remains? a role is worn,
until it feels like skin,
a belief is repeated,
until it sounds like truth,
yet when silence settles,
the costume loosens,
and something simpler stands,
without description...!!
This simpler presence does not need reinforcement. It does not demand agreement. It does not collapse under contradiction. It exists prior to biography.
The comfort of identity comes from predictability. The world becomes manageable when there is a fixed point from which to interpret it. But that fixed point is conceptual. It is an arrangement of thought.
When identity softens, nothing catastrophic occurs. Function remains. Speech continues. Relationships persist. What changes is the rigidity of the center. There is less need to defend, less urgency to prove, less anxiety around change.
Identity provides structure. But structure is not essence.
The fear of losing identity often masks the fear of groundlessness. Yet groundlessness may not be absence, it may be openness without confinement. And, perhaps, what is most natural is not the identity that is carefully assembled, but the awareness in which that assembly appears.
The comfort of identity is understandable. But what lies beyond comfort may be closer to truth.
----------
Notes from an inward dialogue.


